Cari amici del sito vi metto a seguire i commenti su un forum danese sull’incontro del nostro Paolone; come potrete leggere i danesi stessi a maggioranza hanno visto la vittoria di Paolo.
 Filippo Olari

 

dear friends

i need your opinion on Vidoz vs. Bertino. I think my friend Paolo was the better fighter and deserves the victory but the judges gave it to Bertino.

What’s your opinion?

Thanks

Filippo 

 

Hello Fillipo. You are right, Vidoz deserved the victory.
Sadly most of the decisions saturday were bad, I dont want to hear more talk about Germany being the most corrupt boxing country.
After saturday Denmark is nr1….

Razor

 

 I have to disagree on that one … the three fights were very close - and close fights often goes to the homefighter. Germany (and Italy - and for that mater Denmark) has seen clear losers given the win - that was not the case saterday. It was a mater of very close fights going to the hometown boxer. So in my view there is no reason to call this a scandal - and it’s by no means enough to take Germany’s top-rank as boxing-corrupt Wink

 Jan

 

I had for Vidoz with 77-75. Fairly close, but I think it was a gift. 

 Jens

 

77-76 for Vidoz on my card, very close though, can´t say it was a bad decision though.

But Paolo needs to get in better shape - he´s still a capable boxer but was too heavy.

And Bertino showed improved defence and held up well under pressure.

Per-Åke Persson

 

I have to disagree on that one … the three fights were very close - and close fights often goes to the homefighter. Germany (and Italy - and for that mater Denmark) has seen clear losers given the win - that was not the case saterday. It was a mater of very close fights going to the hometown boxer. So in my view there is no reason to call this a scandal - and it’s by no means enough to take Germany’s top-rank as boxing-corrupt Wink


I never used the word ” Scandal” However I said the judges were corrupt. Ask 10 people who saw the event and the 8 will agree with me.
I suddenly remembered why I dont miss Team Palles fight cards…

razor

 

Well with all due respect - Palle’s cards weren’t very often this hard matched - harder matching = closer fights.

As for the “scandal” - I was just thinking of the frase about Denmark being more corrupt than Germany - I don’t think that is the case - not even by a long shot. Some of the judging mght have been small gifts - but there was no thefts - we’ve had plenty of those in Germany … Denmark is still far behind Germany in that area - and Italy for that mater.

 Jan

 

Thank you boys for write in english and tell what’s your opinion!

It’s very important for me and all the people involved in Paolo Vidoz’s homepage to know that.

The “homemade verdict”  it’s a big problem in Germany and in Italy too, there’s no difference, it’s a cancer for our favorite sport like the boxing oranization fragmentation. I didnt know Danish situation before saturday.

It’s a very sad situation that EBU or nationals federations don’t want to resolve the problem.

Filippo Olari

 

Well the organisations are dependent on the money the promotors pay them - and the promotors are “dependent” on their boxers winning most of the time. The promotors also pay the salery of the judges ringside - and if a judge is a it too “fair”, then he will proberbly not be invited the next time.This is of course a simplification - but I believe that much of the problem is in the above.

Only ones with the power to change it is us … if nobody wants to watch, then they will change it … and there is plenty of viewers at the moment … just look at the Ottke reign in Germany for instance.

Jan

 

 The fight was very close. I think it was a fair dicision. A MD victory for Vidoz would have been a fair dicision also.

Munch

 

I had it 5 rounds to 3 for Vidoz, swap 1 round and you have a draw..fair enough, i dont agree with Bertino winning though.

Kesper Jorgensen


Per lasciare un commento è necessario inserire un indirizzo email valido.

La redazione si riserva comunque di rimuovere senza preavviso commenti che violino una o più disposizioni di legge, dunque che siano diffamatori, calunniosi o comunque offensivi dell'altrui dignità, nome, decoro e reputazione; che contengano testi o termini volgari, blasfemi, lesivi della privacy altrui, razzisti; che forniscano informazioni riservate o confidenziali; che contengano dati personali o numeri telefonici propri e di terzi; che siano lesivi di brevetti, marchi, segreti, diritti di autore o altri diritti di proprietà industriale e/o intellettuale; che abbiano contenuti di natura pubblicitaria o propagandistica, e più in generale che utilizzino i messaggi a scopo commerciale (promozione, sponsorizzazione e vendita).

Si comunica, inoltre, che verranno registrati l'indirizzo IP di chi inserisce dei commenti.

In ogni caso, il sito non è responsabile di quanto scritto dagli utenti, che rispondono personalmente delle opinioni espresse e dei fatti riferiti.


5 Risposte a “DISCUSSIONE SU VIDOZ - BERTINO SU FORUM DI BOXE DANESE di Filippo Olari”

  1. Ezio Prapotnich scrive:

    Bella li’, Filippo! A proposito, congratulazioni per la Dalhia card che hai vinto su boxeringweb. non avre isaputo rispondere a quelle 3 domande.

  2. filippo scrive:

    Grazie mille Ezio!

  3. Alessandro scrive:

    Ho appena visto il match di Paolone su youtube e penso proprio che per non riconoscere la vittoria del nostro campione bisogna avere seri problemi di vista… o peggio essere pienamente parziali e corrotti.
    Cmq il Paolone visto con Bertino mi è piaciuto di più di quello visto con Sosnowsky;è stato più grintoso,ha sferrato colpi solidi e decisi e mi pare che il suo ritmo non sia calato per tutta la durata del match.Oserei dire di aver visto quasi un Paolone picchiatore,inedito,che avanzava sempre combattendo con ritmo intenso,mentre Bertino la maggior parte delle volte era li a cercare di contenere la boxe di Paolo.A conferma di ciò,a fine incontro la faccia del danese è segnata e sanguinante.Insomma,un altra infamia si è consumata ai danni del re dei pesi massimi italici.

  4. francesco scrive:

    Be’ almeno non potrete dire che siamo di parte!
    Almeno per una volta……..:)))))

  5. filippo scrive:

    Perchè noi siamo effettivamente di parte! heheeheheheh

Scrivi un Commento